Help
RSS
API
Feed
Maltego
Contact
Domain > www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com
×
More information on this domain is in
AlienVault OTX
Is this malicious?
Yes
No
DNS Resolutions
Date
IP Address
2020-12-17
65.8.233.42
(
ClassC
)
2020-12-17
65.8.233.82
(
ClassC
)
2026-02-09
18.161.6.114
(
ClassC
)
Port 80
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved PermanentlyServer: CloudFrontDate: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 11:37:35 GMTContent-Type: text/htmlContent-Length: 167Connection: keep-aliveLocation: https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/X-Cache: Redirect from cloudfrontVia: 1.1 773bf3616e85ce2b187fa78710a6beb2.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)X-Amz-Cf-Pop: HIO52-P1X-Amz-Cf-Id: 1bwVO08SDlW5sKrcNEzVE8QhecLOQpls0HFD6k6Cggs0ajrSVxWB_Q html>head>title>301 Moved Permanently/title>/head>body>center>h1>301 Moved Permanently/h1>/center>hr>center>CloudFront/center>/body>/html>
Port 443
HTTP/1.1 200 OKContent-Type: text/html; charsetUTF-8Transfer-Encoding: chunkedConnection: keep-aliveDate: Mon, 09 Feb 2026 11:37:35 GMTServer: Apache/2.4.66 (Amazon Linux)Link: https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-json/>; relhttps://api.w.org/X-Cache: Miss from cloudfrontVia: 1.1 46673955829b59a6da0ab071e0b7fbea.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)X-Amz-Cf-Pop: HIO52-P1X-Amz-Cf-Id: t8Zqo50ANvhRAi1NbN3fOhiRPkaXPvtQLxWhFzqGBA3ltHogK4q1bA !doctype html>!--if !IE> html classno-js non-ie langen-US> !endif-->!--if IE 7 > html classno-js ie7 langen-US> !endif-->!--if IE 8 > html classno-js ie8 langen-US> !endif-->!--if IE 9 > html classno-js ie9 langen-US> !endif-->!--if gt IE 9>!--> html classno-js langen-US> !--!endif-->head>meta charsetUTF-8 />meta nameviewport contentwidthdevice-width, user-scalableno, initial-scale1.0, minimum-scale1.0, maximum-scale1.0>title>Cozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer | Covering state and federal first-party property insurance decisions, laws, regulations, and developments effecting the insurance industry./title>link relprofile hrefhttp://gmpg.org/xfn/11 />link relpingback hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/xmlrpc.php />meta namerobots contentmax-image-preview:large />link reldns-prefetch href//ws.sharethis.com />link relalternate typeapplication/rss+xml titleCozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer » Feed hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/feed/ />link relalternate typeapplication/rss+xml titleCozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer » Comments Feed hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/comments/feed/ /> !-- This site uses the Google Analytics by MonsterInsights plugin v10.0.1 - Using Analytics tracking - https://www.monsterinsights.com/ --> !-- Note: MonsterInsights is not currently configured on this site. The site owner needs to authenticate with Google Analytics in the MonsterInsights settings panel. --> !-- No tracking code set --> !-- / Google Analytics by MonsterInsights --> style idwp-img-auto-sizes-contain-inline-css typetext/css>img:is(sizesauto i,sizes^auto, i){contain-intrinsic-size:3000px 1500px}/*# sourceURLwp-img-auto-sizes-contain-inline-css *//style>link relstylesheet idresponsive-style-css hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/themes/propertyinsurancelawobserver/style.css?ver1.9.0 typetext/css mediaall />style idwp-emoji-styles-inline-css typetext/css> img.wp-smiley, img.emoji { display: inline !important; border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; height: 1em !important; width: 1em !important; margin: 0 0.07em !important; vertical-align: -0.1em !important; background: none !important; padding: 0 !important; }/*# sourceURLwp-emoji-styles-inline-css *//style>style idwp-block-library-inline-css typetext/css>:root{--wp-block-synced-color:#7a00df;--wp-block-synced-color--rgb:122,0,223;--wp-bound-block-color:var(--wp-block-synced-color);--wp-editor-canvas-background:#ddd;--wp-admin-theme-color:#007cba;--wp-admin-theme-color--rgb:0,124,186;--wp-admin-theme-color-darker-10:#006ba1;--wp-admin-theme-color-darker-10--rgb:0,107,160.5;--wp-admin-theme-color-darker-20:#005a87;--wp-admin-theme-color-darker-20--rgb:0,90,135;--wp-admin-border-width-focus:2px}@media (min-resolution:192dpi){:root{--wp-admin-border-width-focus:1.5px}}.wp-element-button{cursor:pointer}:root .has-very-light-gray-background-color{background-color:#eee}:root .has-very-dark-gray-background-color{background-color:#313131}:root .has-very-light-gray-color{color:#eee}:root .has-very-dark-gray-color{color:#313131}:root .has-vivid-green-cyan-to-vivid-cyan-blue-gradient-background{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#00d084,#0693e3)}:root .has-purple-crush-gradient-background{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#34e2e4,#4721fb 50%,#ab1dfe)}:root .has-hazy-dawn-gradient-background{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#faaca8,#dad0ec)}:root .has-subdued-olive-gradient-background{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#fafae1,#67a671)}:root .has-atomic-cream-gradient-background{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#fdd79a,#004a59)}:root .has-nightshade-gradient-background{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#330968,#31cdcf)}:root .has-midnight-gradient-background{background:linear-gradient(135deg,#020381,#2874fc)}:root{--wp--preset--font-size--normal:16px;--wp--preset--font-size--huge:42px}.has-regular-font-size{font-size:1em}.has-larger-font-size{font-size:2.625em}.has-normal-font-size{font-size:var(--wp--preset--font-size--normal)}.has-huge-font-size{font-size:var(--wp--preset--font-size--huge)}.has-text-align-center{text-align:center}.has-text-align-left{text-align:left}.has-text-align-right{text-align:right}.has-fit-text{white-space:nowrap!important}#end-resizable-editor-section{display:none}.aligncenter{clear:both}.items-justified-left{justify-content:flex-start}.items-justified-center{justify-content:center}.items-justified-right{justify-content:flex-end}.items-justified-space-between{justify-content:space-between}.screen-reader-text{border:0;clip-path:inset(50%);height:1px;margin:-1px;overflow:hidden;padding:0;position:absolute;width:1px;word-wrap:normal!important}.screen-reader-text:focus{background-color:#ddd;clip-path:none;color:#444;display:block;font-size:1em;height:auto;left:5px;line-height:normal;padding:15px 23px 14px;text-decoration:none;top:5px;width:auto;z-index:100000}html :where(.has-border-color){border-style:solid}html :where(style*border-top-color){border-top-style:solid}html :where(style*border-right-color){border-right-style:solid}html :where(style*border-bottom-color){border-bottom-style:solid}html :where(style*border-left-color){border-left-style:solid}html :where(style*border-width){border-style:solid}html :where(style*border-top-width){border-top-style:solid}html :where(style*border-right-width){border-right-style:solid}html :where(style*border-bottom-width){border-bottom-style:solid}html :where(style*border-left-width){border-left-style:solid}html :where(imgclass*wp-image-){height:auto;max-width:100%}:where(figure){margin:0 0 1em}html :where(.is-position-sticky){--wp-admin--admin-bar--position-offset:var(--wp-admin--admin-bar--height,0px)}@media screen and (max-width:600px){html :where(.is-position-sticky){--wp-admin--admin-bar--position-offset:0px}}/*# sourceURLwp-block-library-inline-css *//style>style idwp-block-paragraph-inline-css typetext/css>.is-small-text{font-size:.875em}.is-regular-text{font-size:1em}.is-large-text{font-size:2.25em}.is-larger-text{font-size:3em}.has-drop-cap:not(:focus):first-letter{float:left;font-size:8.4em;font-style:normal;font-weight:100;line-height:.68;margin:.05em .1em 0 0;text-transform:uppercase}body.rtl .has-drop-cap:not(:focus):first-letter{float:none;margin-left:.1em}p.has-drop-cap.has-background{overflow:hidden}:root :where(p.has-background){padding:1.25em 2.375em}:where(p.has-text-color:not(.has-link-color)) a{color:inherit}p.has-text-align-leftstyle*writing-mode:vertical-lr,p.has-text-align-rightstyle*writing-mode:vertical-rl{rotate:180deg}/*# sourceURLhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-includes/blocks/paragraph/style.min.css *//style>style idclassic-theme-styles-inline-css typetext/css>/*! This file is auto-generated */.wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}/*# sourceURL/wp-includes/css/classic-themes.min.css *//style>style idglobal-styles-inline-css typetext/css>:root{--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--square: 1;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--4-3: 4/3;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--3-4: 3/4;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--3-2: 3/2;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--2-3: 2/3;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--16-9: 16/9;--wp--preset--aspect-ratio--9-16: 9/16;--wp--preset--color--black: #000000;--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray: #abb8c3;--wp--preset--color--white: #ffffff;--wp--preset--color--pale-pink: #f78da7;--wp--preset--color--vivid-red: #cf2e2e;--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange: #ff6900;--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber: #fcb900;--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan: #7bdcb5;--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan: #00d084;--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue: #8ed1fc;--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue: #0693e3;--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple: #9b51e0;--wp--preset--gradient--vivid-cyan-blue-to-vivid-purple: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(6,147,227) 0%,rgb(155,81,224) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--light-green-cyan-to-vivid-green-cyan: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(122,220,180) 0%,rgb(0,208,130) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-amber-to-luminous-vivid-orange: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(252,185,0) 0%,rgb(255,105,0) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-orange-to-vivid-red: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(255,105,0) 0%,rgb(207,46,46) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(238,238,238) 0%,rgb(169,184,195) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--cool-to-warm-spectrum: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(74,234,220) 0%,rgb(151,120,209) 20%,rgb(207,42,186) 40%,rgb(238,44,130) 60%,rgb(251,105,98) 80%,rgb(254,248,76) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--blush-light-purple: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(255,206,236) 0%,rgb(152,150,240) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--blush-bordeaux: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(254,205,165) 0%,rgb(254,45,45) 50%,rgb(107,0,62) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-dusk: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(255,203,112) 0%,rgb(199,81,192) 50%,rgb(65,88,208) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--pale-ocean: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(255,245,203) 0%,rgb(182,227,212) 50%,rgb(51,167,181) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--electric-grass: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(202,248,128) 0%,rgb(113,206,126) 100%);--wp--preset--gradient--midnight: linear-gradient(135deg,rgb(2,3,129) 0%,rgb(40,116,252) 100%);--wp--preset--font-size--small: 13px;--wp--preset--font-size--medium: 20px;--wp--preset--font-size--large: 36px;--wp--preset--font-size--x-large: 42px;--wp--preset--spacing--20: 0.44rem;--wp--preset--spacing--30: 0.67rem;--wp--preset--spacing--40: 1rem;--wp--preset--spacing--50: 1.5rem;--wp--preset--spacing--60: 2.25rem;--wp--preset--spacing--70: 3.38rem;--wp--preset--spacing--80: 5.06rem;--wp--preset--shadow--natural: 6px 6px 9px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);--wp--preset--shadow--deep: 12px 12px 50px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4);--wp--preset--shadow--sharp: 6px 6px 0px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);--wp--preset--shadow--outlined: 6px 6px 0px -3px rgb(255, 255, 255), 6px 6px rgb(0, 0, 0);--wp--preset--shadow--crisp: 6px 6px 0px rgb(0, 0, 0);}:where(.is-layout-flex){gap: 0.5em;}:where(.is-layout-grid){gap: 0.5em;}body .is-layout-flex{display: flex;}.is-layout-flex{flex-wrap: wrap;align-items: center;}.is-layout-flex > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}body .is-layout-grid{display: grid;}.is-layout-grid > :is(*, div){margin: 0;}:where(.wp-block-columns.is-layout-flex){gap: 2em;}:where(.wp-block-columns.is-layout-grid){gap: 2em;}:where(.wp-block-post-template.is-layout-flex){gap: 1.25em;}:where(.wp-block-post-template.is-layout-grid){gap: 1.25em;}.has-black-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--black) !important;}.has-cyan-bluish-gray-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-white-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--white) !important;}.has-pale-pink-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-pink) !important;}.has-vivid-red-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-red) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan) !important;}.has-vivid-green-cyan-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-pale-cyan-blue-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-purple-color{color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple) !important;}.has-black-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--black) !important;}.has-cyan-bluish-gray-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-white-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--white) !important;}.has-pale-pink-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-pink) !important;}.has-vivid-red-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-red) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan) !important;}.has-vivid-green-cyan-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-pale-cyan-blue-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-purple-background-color{background-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple) !important;}.has-black-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--black) !important;}.has-cyan-bluish-gray-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-white-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--white) !important;}.has-pale-pink-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-pink) !important;}.has-vivid-red-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-red) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--luminous-vivid-amber) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--light-green-cyan) !important;}.has-vivid-green-cyan-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-pale-cyan-blue-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--pale-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-cyan-blue) !important;}.has-vivid-purple-border-color{border-color: var(--wp--preset--color--vivid-purple) !important;}.has-vivid-cyan-blue-to-vivid-purple-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--vivid-cyan-blue-to-vivid-purple) !important;}.has-light-green-cyan-to-vivid-green-cyan-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--light-green-cyan-to-vivid-green-cyan) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-amber-to-luminous-vivid-orange-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-amber-to-luminous-vivid-orange) !important;}.has-luminous-vivid-orange-to-vivid-red-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-vivid-orange-to-vivid-red) !important;}.has-very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--very-light-gray-to-cyan-bluish-gray) !important;}.has-cool-to-warm-spectrum-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--cool-to-warm-spectrum) !important;}.has-blush-light-purple-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--blush-light-purple) !important;}.has-blush-bordeaux-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--blush-bordeaux) !important;}.has-luminous-dusk-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--luminous-dusk) !important;}.has-pale-ocean-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--pale-ocean) !important;}.has-electric-grass-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--electric-grass) !important;}.has-midnight-gradient-background{background: var(--wp--preset--gradient--midnight) !important;}.has-small-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--small) !important;}.has-medium-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--medium) !important;}.has-large-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--large) !important;}.has-x-large-font-size{font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--x-large) !important;}/*# sourceURLglobal-styles-inline-css *//style>link relstylesheet idcosubscribecss-css hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/plugins/cosubscriber//css/cosubscribe.css?ver6.9.1 typetext/css mediaall />link relstylesheet idwp-author-bio-css hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-about-author/wp-about-author.css?ver6.9.1 typetext/css mediaall />script idst_insights_js typetext/javascript srchttps://ws.sharethis.com/button/st_insights.js?publisher4d48b7c5-0ae3-43d4-bfbe-3ff8c17a8ae6&productsimpleshare&ver8.5.3 idssba-sharethis-js>/script>script typetext/javascript srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver3.7.1 idjquery-core-js>/script>script typetext/javascript srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver3.4.1 idjquery-migrate-js>/script>script typetext/javascript srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/themes/propertyinsurancelawobserver/js/responsive-modernizr.js?ver2.6.1 idmodernizr-js>/script>script typetext/javascript srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/plugins/cosubscriber//js/cosubscriber.js?ver6.9.1 idcosubscriberjs-js>/script>link relhttps://api.w.org/ hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-json/ />link relEditURI typeapplication/rsd+xml titleRSD hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/xmlrpc.php?rsd />meta namegenerator contentWordPress 6.9.1 />!-- coplugin -->style> .personlink img {margin-right: 10px; }#main .personlink, #content .personlink { font-size: 0.9em;}.authorhead { border-bottom: 1px solid black; margin-bottom: 5px;}#main .personlink p, #content .personlink p { margin-left: 118px; } /style>script typetext/javascript>(function(url){ if(/(?:Chrome\/26\.0\.1410\.63 Safari\/537\.31|WordfenceTestMonBot)/.test(navigator.userAgent)){ return; } var addEvent function(evt, handler) { if (window.addEventListener) { document.addEventListener(evt, handler, false); } else if (window.attachEvent) { document.attachEvent(on + evt, handler); } }; var removeEvent function(evt, handler) { if (window.removeEventListener) { document.removeEventListener(evt, handler, false); } else if (window.detachEvent) { document.detachEvent(on + evt, handler); } }; var evts contextmenu dblclick drag dragend dragenter dragleave dragover dragstart drop keydown keypress keyup mousedown mousemove mouseout mouseover mouseup mousewheel scroll.split( ); var logHuman function() { if (window.wfLogHumanRan) { return; } window.wfLogHumanRan true; var wfscr document.createElement(script); wfscr.type text/javascript; wfscr.async true; wfscr.src url + &r + Math.random(); (document.getElementsByTagName(head)0||document.getElementsByTagName(body)0).appendChild(wfscr); for (var i 0; i evts.length; i++) { removeEvent(evtsi, logHuman); } }; for (var i 0; i evts.length; i++) { addEvent(evtsi, logHuman); }})(//www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/?wordfence_lh1&hid3426DBCBD0EEAA2FEF8BE364FB93EC6E);/script>!-- Custom Scripts -->!-- Google tag (gtag.js) -->script async srchttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?idG-XKNR7X158B>/script>script> window.dataLayer window.dataLayer || ; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag(js, new Date()); gtag(config, G-XKNR7X158B);/script>!-- We need this for debugging -->!-- PropertyInsuranceLawObserver 1 -->!-- There is no amphtml version available for this URL. -->/head>body classhome blog wp-theme-propertyinsurancelawobserver> div idcontainer classhfeed> div idheader> div idlogo> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/>img src/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/headers/3.jpg altCozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer />/a> /div>!-- end of #logo1 --> ul idmenu-main-menu classmenu>li idmenu-item-20 classmenu-item menu-item-type-custom menu-item-object-custom menu-item-20>a hrefhttp://propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/>Home/a>/li>li idmenu-item-22 classmenu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-22>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/services/>Services/a>/li>li idmenu-item-21 classmenu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-21>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/about/>About/a>/li>li classsearch-form stylefloat: right; margin-right: 20px;>form rolesearch classsearch-form methodget idsearchform actionhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/>input typetext valuesearch classsearch-form names ids /> input typesubmit classsubmit namesubmit idsearchsubmit valueGo />/form>/li>/ul> /div>!-- end of #header --> div idwrapper classclearfix> div idcontent-blog classgrid col-620> div idpost-2574 classpost-2574 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-insurance-coverage tag-insurance-law tag-property-damage> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2026/02/06/court-says-ensuing-loss-requires-more-than-increased-susceptibility/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Court Says Ensuing Loss Requires More Than Increased Susceptibility>Court Says Ensuing Loss Requires More Than Increased Susceptibility/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2026/02/06/court-says-ensuing-loss-requires-more-than-increased-susceptibility/ title5:49 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>February 6, 2026/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2026/02/06/court-says-ensuing-loss-requires-more-than-increased-susceptibility/ title5:49 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>February 6, 2026/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2026/02/06/court-says-ensuing-loss-requires-more-than-increased-susceptibility/ titleCourt Says Ensuing Loss Requires More Than Increased Susceptibility > img width3900 height1732 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2026/02/shutterstock_2327187161.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync fetchpriorityhigh /> /a> p>In em>Stella Property Development and Event Production, LLC v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company/em>, 2026 WL 221489 (W.D. Pa. 2026), the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied summary judgment as to the applicability of the subject property policy’s (i) wear and tear and (ii) inadequate maintenance exclusions, holding that those issues were to be resolved by the factfinder rather than decided as a matter of law. However, the Court further held that if (i) wear and tear and (ii) inadequate maintenance were ultimately found to be dominant and efficient causes of the roof damage, the ensuing loss clauses would not reinstate coverage because those excluded conditions merely increased the roof’s susceptibility to wind damage, rather than resulting in the windstorm itself.a href#_ftn1 id_ftnref1>1/a>/p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2026/02/06/court-says-ensuing-loss-requires-more-than-increased-susceptibility/#more-2574 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?pjtumen@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/insurance-coverage/ reltag>insurance coverage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/insurance-law/ reltag>insurance law/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-damage/ reltag>property damage/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2574 --> div idpost-2566 classpost-2566 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-duty-to-advise-of-coverage> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/12/08/texas-court-affirms-no-duty-to-advise-on-coverage-adequacy-key-takeaways-from-century-suretys-win/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Texas Court Affirms No Duty to Advise on Coverage Adequacy: Key Takeaways from Century Surety’s Win>Texas Court Affirms No Duty to Advise on Coverage Adequacy: Key Takeaways from Century Surety’s Win/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/12/08/texas-court-affirms-no-duty-to-advise-on-coverage-adequacy-key-takeaways-from-century-suretys-win/ title3:39 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>December 8, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/tjordan/ titleView all posts by Tracey Jordan>Tracey Jordan/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/12/08/texas-court-affirms-no-duty-to-advise-on-coverage-adequacy-key-takeaways-from-century-suretys-win/ title3:39 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>December 8, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/tjordan/ titleView all posts by Tracey Jordan>Tracey Jordan/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/12/08/texas-court-affirms-no-duty-to-advise-on-coverage-adequacy-key-takeaways-from-century-suretys-win/ titleTexas Court Affirms No Duty to Advise on Coverage Adequacy: Key Takeaways from Century Surety’s Win > img width1000 height667 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/12/shutterstock_2475570589.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy /> /a> p>In em>Century Surety Co. v. EC & SM Guerra, LLC/em>, 5:23-CV-01215-XR-RBF, 2025 WL 2602288 (W.D. Tex. Aug. 21, 2025) aff’2025 WL 2598375 (Sept. 5, 2025), the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas reaffirmed the magistrate’s report and recommendation holding that because the insured received a policy with its requested limits, Century did not breach the insurance contract. The Court further held that Century had no duty to advise the insured of the adequacy of the coverage for the insured property./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/12/08/texas-court-affirms-no-duty-to-advise-on-coverage-adequacy-key-takeaways-from-century-suretys-win/#more-2566 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?ptjordan@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/duty-to-advise-of-coverage/ reltag>Duty to Advise of Coverage/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2566 --> div idpost-2560 classpost-2560 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-appellate-court tag-florida-insurance tag-homeowners-policy tag-insurance-coverage tag-residency> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/24/florida-appellate-court-confirms-insurer-cannot-waive-residency-requirement-in-homeowners-policy/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Florida Appellate Court Confirms Insurer Cannot Waive Residency Requirement in Homeowners Policy>Florida Appellate Court Confirms Insurer Cannot Waive Residency Requirement in Homeowners Policy/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/697578b92912ab35ca6f8763c2f58785fd13796f9bba3bebd3110a99db448f6c?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/697578b92912ab35ca6f8763c2f58785fd13796f9bba3bebd3110a99db448f6c?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/24/florida-appellate-court-confirms-insurer-cannot-waive-residency-requirement-in-homeowners-policy/ title8:00 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>November 24, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/sroman/ titleView all posts by Stephanie Roman>Stephanie Roman/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/697578b92912ab35ca6f8763c2f58785fd13796f9bba3bebd3110a99db448f6c?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/697578b92912ab35ca6f8763c2f58785fd13796f9bba3bebd3110a99db448f6c?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/24/florida-appellate-court-confirms-insurer-cannot-waive-residency-requirement-in-homeowners-policy/ title8:00 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>November 24, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/sroman/ titleView all posts by Stephanie Roman>Stephanie Roman/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/24/florida-appellate-court-confirms-insurer-cannot-waive-residency-requirement-in-homeowners-policy/ titleFlorida Appellate Court Confirms Insurer Cannot Waive Residency Requirement in Homeowners Policy > img width1000 height667 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/11/shutterstock_2173812661.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy /> /a> p>Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal recently clarified the enforceability of the “residence-premises” requirement in homeowners’ insurance policies. In em>Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Boniface Jean/em>, the appellate court reversed a jury verdict in favor of the homeowner, holding that coverage cannot be created by waiver when the insured does not reside at the covered property./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/24/florida-appellate-court-confirms-insurer-cannot-waive-residency-requirement-in-homeowners-policy/#more-2560 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?psroman@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/appellate-court/ reltag>appellate court/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/florida-insurance/ reltag>Florida insurance/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/homeowners-policy/ reltag>Homeowners policy/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/insurance-coverage/ reltag>insurance coverage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/residency/ reltag>residency/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2560 --> div idpost-2552 classpost-2552 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-hail-damage tag-insurance-coverage tag-property-damage> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/17/dents-dont-count-court-clarifies-hail-damage-coverage/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Dents Don’t Count: Court Clarifies Hail Damage Coverage>Dents Don’t Count: Court Clarifies Hail Damage Coverage/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/17/dents-dont-count-court-clarifies-hail-damage-coverage/ title5:01 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>November 17, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/17/dents-dont-count-court-clarifies-hail-damage-coverage/ title5:01 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>November 17, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/17/dents-dont-count-court-clarifies-hail-damage-coverage/ titleDents Don’t Count: Court Clarifies Hail Damage Coverage > img width1792 height1008 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/11/shutterstock_2507974153.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy /> /a> p>In em>Cannon Falls Area Schools v. Hanover American Insurance Company/em> (2025 WL 2976533 (D. Minn. 2025)), the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota held that a property insurer properly denied coverage pursuant to a cosmetic damage exclusion because hail indentations to roofs affected only their appearance, not their ability to function as barriers against the elements. The Court emphasized the roofs’ performance immediately following the loss rather than any speculative future vulnerabilities./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/17/dents-dont-count-court-clarifies-hail-damage-coverage/#more-2552 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?pjtumen@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/hail-damage/ reltag>hail damage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/insurance-coverage/ reltag>insurance coverage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-damage/ reltag>property damage/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2552 --> div idpost-2537 classpost-2537 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-builders-risk tag-insurance-coverage tag-property-damage tag-property-insurance> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/18/court-interprets-completion-of-a-project-under-builders-risk-insurance/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Court Interprets “Completion” of a Project Under Builder’s Risk Insurance>Court Interprets “Completion” of a Project Under Builder’s Risk Insurance/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/18/court-interprets-completion-of-a-project-under-builders-risk-insurance/ title7:33 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>August 18, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/18/court-interprets-completion-of-a-project-under-builders-risk-insurance/ title7:33 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>August 18, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/18/court-interprets-completion-of-a-project-under-builders-risk-insurance/ titleCourt Interprets “Completion” of a Project Under Builder’s Risk Insurance > img width1000 height675 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/08/Shutterstock_2115813911-2.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy /> /a> p>In em>Luke, Inc. v. Berkley National Insurance Company/em>, 2025 WL 2210783 (W.D. Tenn. 2025), the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee determined that the “completion” of a construction project for purposes of coverage under a builder’s risk policy concerned the permanent physical elements of the structure, and not whether it was fully operational as a business./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/18/court-interprets-completion-of-a-project-under-builders-risk-insurance/#more-2537 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?pjtumen@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/builders-risk/ reltag>builder’s risk/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/insurance-coverage/ reltag>insurance coverage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-damage/ reltag>property damage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-insurance/ reltag>property insurance/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2537 --> div idpost-2530 classpost-2530 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-builders-risk tag-faulty-workmanship tag-insurance-coverage tag-property-damage> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/05/court-differentiates-faulty-and-defective-workmanship-from-vandalism-or-malicious-mischief/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Court Differentiates Faulty and Defective Workmanship from Vandalism or Malicious Mischief>Court Differentiates Faulty and Defective Workmanship from Vandalism or Malicious Mischief/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/05/court-differentiates-faulty-and-defective-workmanship-from-vandalism-or-malicious-mischief/ title1:26 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>August 5, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/075803c8e592280b6c17f972436f1077d2e86b1e3b348bc71c3d880cc22a933b?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/05/court-differentiates-faulty-and-defective-workmanship-from-vandalism-or-malicious-mischief/ title1:26 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>August 5, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/ titleView all posts by Joshua Tumen>Joshua Tumen/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/05/court-differentiates-faulty-and-defective-workmanship-from-vandalism-or-malicious-mischief/ titleCourt Differentiates Faulty and Defective Workmanship from Vandalism or Malicious Mischief > img width2400 height1700 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/08/shutterstock_2465678655.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy /> /a> p>In em>Carr v. Spinnaker Insurance Company/em>, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court’s finding that property damage resulting from objectionable and imperfect work performed by an unlicensed contractor did not constitute covered vandalism or malicious mischief under a property insurance policy. Instead, the loss fit squarely within the policy’s faulty and defective workmanship exclusion./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/05/court-differentiates-faulty-and-defective-workmanship-from-vandalism-or-malicious-mischief/#more-2530 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?pjtumen@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/builders-risk/ reltag>builder’s risk/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/faulty-workmanship/ reltag>faulty workmanship/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/insurance-coverage/ reltag>insurance coverage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-damage/ reltag>property damage/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2530 --> div idpost-2522 classpost-2522 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-bad-faith-2 tag-discovery-2 tag-reinsurance tag-reserve> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/07/31/southern-district-court-of-new-york-permits-extensive-discovery-of-reserve-and-reinsurance-information-in-bad-faith-litigation/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Southern District Court of New York Permits Extensive Discovery of Reserve And Reinsurance Information in Bad Faith Litigation>Southern District Court of New York Permits Extensive Discovery of Reserve And Reinsurance Information in Bad Faith Litigation/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/07/31/southern-district-court-of-new-york-permits-extensive-discovery-of-reserve-and-reinsurance-information-in-bad-faith-litigation/ title7:47 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>July 31, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/tjordan/ titleView all posts by Tracey Jordan>Tracey Jordan/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e5629b99ce672845fb02aee5a06dd7bd8d51704be1fbe294c3c1402618201590?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/07/31/southern-district-court-of-new-york-permits-extensive-discovery-of-reserve-and-reinsurance-information-in-bad-faith-litigation/ title7:47 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>July 31, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/tjordan/ titleView all posts by Tracey Jordan>Tracey Jordan/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/07/31/southern-district-court-of-new-york-permits-extensive-discovery-of-reserve-and-reinsurance-information-in-bad-faith-litigation/ titleSouthern District Court of New York Permits Extensive Discovery of Reserve And Reinsurance Information in Bad Faith Litigation > img width1000 height435 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/07/shutterstock_641039170.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy /> /a> p>In em>Mandarin Oriental, Inc. v. HDI Glob. Ins. Co. et al/em>., Civil Action No. 23 Civ. 4951, 2025 WL 1638071 (S.D.N.Y. June 10, 2025), the District Court of the Southern District of New York followed the modern trend and allowed discovery of reserve and reinsurance information in coverage litigation with allegations of bad faith. /p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/07/31/southern-district-court-of-new-york-permits-extensive-discovery-of-reserve-and-reinsurance-information-in-bad-faith-litigation/#more-2522 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?ptjordan@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/bad-faith-2/ reltag>Bad Faith/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/discovery-2/ reltag>Discovery/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/reinsurance/ reltag>reinsurance/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/reserve/ reltag>reserve/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2522 --> div idpost-2509 classpost-2509 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-bad-faith-2 tag-insurance-coverage tag-property-damage> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/06/12/insurers-use-of-conflicting-reports-not-bad-faith-says-court/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Insurer’s Use of Conflicting Reports Not Bad Faith, Says Court>Insurer’s Use of Conflicting Reports Not Bad Faith, Says Court/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ba6995cdb0aa52e98e127a436173dba91164f4d337cf37500fdd806166af85e9?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ba6995cdb0aa52e98e127a436173dba91164f4d337cf37500fdd806166af85e9?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/06/12/insurers-use-of-conflicting-reports-not-bad-faith-says-court/ title2:36 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>June 12, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/pferland/ titleView all posts by Paul Ferland>Paul Ferland/a>/span>--> div classpublished posted_date title2025-06-12 14:36:34+00:00>Posted on June 12, 2025 by span classco-author-display-name> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/pferland/>Paul Ferland/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/>Joshua Tumen/a> /span>/div> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/06/12/insurers-use-of-conflicting-reports-not-bad-faith-says-court/ titleInsurer’s Use of Conflicting Reports Not Bad Faith, Says Court > img width1000 height667 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/06/shutterstock_1540667234.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy srcsethttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/06/shutterstock_1540667234.jpg 1000w, https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/06/shutterstock_1540667234-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/06/shutterstock_1540667234-768x512.jpg 768w sizesauto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px /> /a> p>In em>El Dueno, LLC v. Mid-Century Insurance Company/em> (2025 WL 1540329) (10th Cir. 2025)), the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgement on behalf of the insurer on the basis that the insurer did not act in bad faith when it denied the insured’s claim based on an engineering report that contradicted an adjuster’s initial findings./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/06/12/insurers-use-of-conflicting-reports-not-bad-faith-says-court/#more-2509 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Authors/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?ppferland@cozen.com>/script>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?pjtumen@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/bad-faith-2/ reltag>Bad Faith/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/insurance-coverage/ reltag>insurance coverage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-damage/ reltag>property damage/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2509 --> div idpost-2499 classpost-2499 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized tag-duties-after-loss tag-duty-to-cooperate tag-prejudice tag-property-damage tag-property-insurance> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/20/noncompliance-with-policys-duties-after-loss-provision-leads-to-denial-of-fire-loss-claim/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Noncompliance With Policy’s “Duties After Loss” Provision Leads to Denial of Fire Loss Claim>Noncompliance With Policy’s “Duties After Loss” Provision Leads to Denial of Fire Loss Claim/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b25abc456dd40f1af3f44cc806782fd093a58aa3afeda9ecc7149a2e047fee38?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b25abc456dd40f1af3f44cc806782fd093a58aa3afeda9ecc7149a2e047fee38?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/20/noncompliance-with-policys-duties-after-loss-provision-leads-to-denial-of-fire-loss-claim/ title1:02 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>May 20, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/lberenbaum/ titleView all posts by Lauren Berenbaum>Lauren Berenbaum/a>/span>--> img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b25abc456dd40f1af3f44cc806782fd093a58aa3afeda9ecc7149a2e047fee38?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b25abc456dd40f1af3f44cc806782fd093a58aa3afeda9ecc7149a2e047fee38?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/> span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/20/noncompliance-with-policys-duties-after-loss-provision-leads-to-denial-of-fire-loss-claim/ title1:02 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>May 20, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/lberenbaum/ titleView all posts by Lauren Berenbaum>Lauren Berenbaum/a>/span> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/20/noncompliance-with-policys-duties-after-loss-provision-leads-to-denial-of-fire-loss-claim/ titleNoncompliance With Policy’s “Duties After Loss” Provision Leads to Denial of Fire Loss Claim > img width1000 height667 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2195979631.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy srcsethttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2195979631.jpg 1000w, https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2195979631-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2195979631-768x512.jpg 768w sizesauto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px /> /a> p>In em>Caribe D. Billie v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp. et al/em>, the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut granted Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.’s (“Insurer”) motion for summary judgment, holding that the Insurer was prejudiced by its insured’s failure to cooperate with the Policy’s “Duties After Loss” provision./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/20/noncompliance-with-policys-duties-after-loss-provision-leads-to-denial-of-fire-loss-claim/#more-2499 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Author/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?plberenbaum@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Tagged with: a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/duties-after-loss/ reltag>duties after loss/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/duty-to-cooperate/ reltag>Duty to Cooperate/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/prejudice/ reltag>prejudice/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-damage/ reltag>property damage/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/tag/property-insurance/ reltag>property insurance/a>br /> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2499 --> div idpost-2491 classpost-2491 post type-post status-publish format-standard has-post-thumbnail hentry category-uncategorized> h1 classpost-title>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/12/court-weighs-in-on-determining-period-of-restoration/ relbookmark titlePermanent Link to Court Weighs in on Determining “Period of Restoration”>Court Weighs in on Determining “Period of Restoration”/a>/h1>div classpost-meta>!--div stylefloat: left; margin-right: 15px;>img alt srchttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ba6995cdb0aa52e98e127a436173dba91164f4d337cf37500fdd806166af85e9?s32&dmm&rg srcsethttps://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/ba6995cdb0aa52e98e127a436173dba91164f4d337cf37500fdd806166af85e9?s64&dmm&rg 2x classavatar avatar-32 photo height32 width32 loadinglazy decodingasync/>/div>span classmeta-prep meta-prep-author posted>Posted on /span>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/12/court-weighs-in-on-determining-period-of-restoration/ title3:19 pm relbookmark>span classtimestamp>May 12, 2025/span>/a>span classbyline> by /span>span classauthor vcard>a classurl fn n hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/pferland/ titleView all posts by Paul Ferland>Paul Ferland/a>/span>--> div classpublished posted_date title2025-05-12 15:19:19+00:00>Posted on May 12, 2025 by span classco-author-display-name> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/pferland/>Paul Ferland/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/jtumen/>Joshua Tumen/a>, a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/author/tjordan/>Tracey Jordan/a> /span>/div> /div>!-- end of .post-meta --> div classpost-entry> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/12/court-weighs-in-on-determining-period-of-restoration/ titleCourt Weighs in on Determining “Period of Restoration” > img width1000 height667 srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2324204771-1.jpg classattachment-post-thumbnail size-post-thumbnail wp-post-image alt decodingasync loadinglazy srcsethttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2324204771-1.jpg 1000w, https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2324204771-1-300x200.jpg 300w, https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2025/05/shutterstock_2324204771-1-768x512.jpg 768w sizesauto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px /> /a> p>In em>Comprehensive Medical Center, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company/em>, 2025 WL 416814 (9th Cir. 2025), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s determination that the period of restoration tied to water damage at the insured’s commercial property was the theoretical period when repairs should have been completed with reasonable speed, not the actual period of repairs thwarted by extraneous delays./p> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/12/court-weighs-in-on-determining-period-of-restoration/#more-2491 classmore-link>Read more ›/a>div classauthorhead>About The Authors/div>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?ppferland@cozen.com>/script>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?pjtumen@cozen.com>/script>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/people.js?ptjordan@cozen.com>/script> /div>!-- end of .post-entry --> div classpost-data> Posted in a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a> /div>!-- end of .post-data --> div classpost-edit>/div> /div>!-- end of #post-2491 --> div classnavigation> div classprevious>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/page/2/ >‹ Older posts/a>/div> div classnext>/div> /div>!-- end of .navigation --> /div>!-- end of #content-blog -->div idwidgets classgrid col-300 fit> div idtext-2 classwidget-wrapper widget_text>div classwidget-title>About The Property Insurance Law Observer/div> div classtextwidget>p>For more than five decades, Cozen O’Connor has represented all types of property insurers in jurisdictions throughout the United States, and it is dedicated to keeping its clients abreast of developments that impact the insurance industry. The Property Insurance Law Observer will survey court decisions, enacted or proposed legislation, and regulatory activities from all 50 states. We will also include commentary on current issues and developing trends of interest to first-party insurers./p>/div> /div>div idczsubscriber_widget-2 classwidget-wrapper czsubscriber_widget>div classwidget-title>Subscribe For Updates/div>p classczsubconfirm styledisplay: none;>Thank you for registering. Please check your email to confirm your subscription./p>p classczsubform>input typetext autocompleteemail value namecz-subscriber-email size20 idcz-subscriber-email required placeholderEmail Address />/p>p styledisplay: none;>propertyinsurancelawobserver/p> input typehidden idcz-subscriber-list namecz-subscriber-list valuepropertyinsurancelawobserver>p classczsubform>button rolebutton tabindex0 onclickhandleCommand() onKeyDownhandleCommand()>Subscribe/button>/p>/div> div idrecent-posts-2 classwidget-wrapper widget_recent_entries> div classwidget-title>Recent Posts/div> ul> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2026/02/06/court-says-ensuing-loss-requires-more-than-increased-susceptibility/>Court Says Ensuing Loss Requires More Than Increased Susceptibility/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/12/08/texas-court-affirms-no-duty-to-advise-on-coverage-adequacy-key-takeaways-from-century-suretys-win/>Texas Court Affirms No Duty to Advise on Coverage Adequacy: Key Takeaways from Century Surety’s Win/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/24/florida-appellate-court-confirms-insurer-cannot-waive-residency-requirement-in-homeowners-policy/>Florida Appellate Court Confirms Insurer Cannot Waive Residency Requirement in Homeowners Policy/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/17/dents-dont-count-court-clarifies-hail-damage-coverage/>Dents Don’t Count: Court Clarifies Hail Damage Coverage/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/18/court-interprets-completion-of-a-project-under-builders-risk-insurance/>Court Interprets “Completion” of a Project Under Builder’s Risk Insurance/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/05/court-differentiates-faulty-and-defective-workmanship-from-vandalism-or-malicious-mischief/>Court Differentiates Faulty and Defective Workmanship from Vandalism or Malicious Mischief/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/07/31/southern-district-court-of-new-york-permits-extensive-discovery-of-reserve-and-reinsurance-information-in-bad-faith-litigation/>Southern District Court of New York Permits Extensive Discovery of Reserve And Reinsurance Information in Bad Faith Litigation/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/06/12/insurers-use-of-conflicting-reports-not-bad-faith-says-court/>Insurer’s Use of Conflicting Reports Not Bad Faith, Says Court/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/20/noncompliance-with-policys-duties-after-loss-provision-leads-to-denial-of-fire-loss-claim/>Noncompliance With Policy’s “Duties After Loss” Provision Leads to Denial of Fire Loss Claim/a> /li> li> a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/12/court-weighs-in-on-determining-period-of-restoration/>Court Weighs in on Determining “Period of Restoration”/a> /li> /ul> /div>div idarchives-2 classwidget-wrapper widget_archive>div classwidget-title>Archives/div> ul> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2026/02/>February 2026/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/12/>December 2025/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/11/>November 2025/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/08/>August 2025/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/07/>July 2025/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/06/>June 2025/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/05/>May 2025/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/04/>April 2025/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/03/>March 2025/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/02/>February 2025/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2025/01/>January 2025/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/10/>October 2024/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/09/>September 2024/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/08/>August 2024/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/07/>July 2024/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/06/>June 2024/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/05/>May 2024/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/03/>March 2024/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/02/>February 2024/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2024/01/>January 2024/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2023/11/>November 2023/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2023/08/>August 2023/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2023/03/>March 2023/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2023/02/>February 2023/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/12/>December 2022/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/10/>October 2022/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/09/>September 2022/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/08/>August 2022/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/07/>July 2022/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/06/>June 2022/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/05/>May 2022/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/04/>April 2022/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/03/>March 2022/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/02/>February 2022/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2022/01/>January 2022/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/12/>December 2021/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/11/>November 2021/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/10/>October 2021/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/09/>September 2021/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/08/>August 2021/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/07/>July 2021/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/06/>June 2021/a> (5)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/05/>May 2021/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/04/>April 2021/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2021/01/>January 2021/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2020/11/>November 2020/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2020/10/>October 2020/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2020/08/>August 2020/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2020/04/>April 2020/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2020/03/>March 2020/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2019/10/>October 2019/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2019/07/>July 2019/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2019/06/>June 2019/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2019/05/>May 2019/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2019/04/>April 2019/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2018/12/>December 2018/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2018/06/>June 2018/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2018/03/>March 2018/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2018/01/>January 2018/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2017/10/>October 2017/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2017/08/>August 2017/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2017/07/>July 2017/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2017/06/>June 2017/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2017/02/>February 2017/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2017/01/>January 2017/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/10/>October 2016/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/09/>September 2016/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/08/>August 2016/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/07/>July 2016/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/06/>June 2016/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/05/>May 2016/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/04/>April 2016/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/03/>March 2016/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/02/>February 2016/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2016/01/>January 2016/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/12/>December 2015/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/11/>November 2015/a> (11)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/10/>October 2015/a> (7)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/09/>September 2015/a> (5)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/08/>August 2015/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/07/>July 2015/a> (9)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/06/>June 2015/a> (5)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/05/>May 2015/a> (7)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/04/>April 2015/a> (7)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/03/>March 2015/a> (6)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/02/>February 2015/a> (5)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2015/01/>January 2015/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/12/>December 2014/a> (6)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/11/>November 2014/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/10/>October 2014/a> (5)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/09/>September 2014/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/08/>August 2014/a> (5)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/07/>July 2014/a> (6)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/06/>June 2014/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/05/>May 2014/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/04/>April 2014/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/03/>March 2014/a> (4)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/02/>February 2014/a> (2)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2014/01/>January 2014/a> (3)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2013/12/>December 2013/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2013/11/>November 2013/a> (1)/li> li>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/2013/10/>October 2013/a> (1)/li> /ul> /div>div idcategories-2 classwidget-wrapper widget_categories>div classwidget-title>Topics/div> ul> li classcat-item cat-item-914>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/act-of-nature/>Act of Nature/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-15>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/actual-cash-value/>Actual Cash Value/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-37>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/additional-insureds/>Additional Insureds/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-162>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/all-risk/>All Risk/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-16>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/ambiguity/>Ambiguity/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-170>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/anti-concurrent-causation/>Anti-Concurrent Causation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-64>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/arbitration-and-appraisal/>Arbitration and Appraisal/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-122>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/arson-and-fraud/>Arson and Fraud/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-758>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/assignment-of-benefits-2/>Assignment of Benefits/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-138>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/bad-faith/>Bad Faith/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-102>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/builders-risk/>Builders' Risk/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-163>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/burden-of-proof/>Burden of Proof/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-34>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/business-interuption/>Business Interuption/a>ul classchildren> li classcat-item cat-item-51>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/business-interuption/contingent-business-interruption/>Contingent Business Interruption/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-103>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/business-interuption/delay-in-completion/>Delay in Completion/a>/li>/ul>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-92>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/cancellation/>Cancellation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-47>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/catastrophes/>Catastrophes/a>ul classchildren> li classcat-item cat-item-218>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/catastrophes/hurricane-ike/>Hurricane Ike/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-169>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/catastrophes/hurricane-irene/>Hurricane Irene/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-175>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/catastrophes/hurricane-wilma/>Hurricane Wilma/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-48>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/catastrophes/superstorm-sandy/>Superstorm Sandy/a>/li>/ul>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-65>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causation/>Causation/a>ul classchildren> li classcat-item cat-item-183>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causation/theft-or-dishonesty/>Theft or Dishonesty/a>/li>/ul>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-39>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/>Causes of Loss/a>ul classchildren> li classcat-item cat-item-57>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/acts-or-decisions/>Acts or Decisions/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-124>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/arson/>Arson/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-144>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/collapse/>Collapse/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-176>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/contamination/>Contamination/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-178>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/corrosion/>Corrosion/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-289>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/cyber/>Cyber/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-109>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/decomposition/>Decomposition/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-77>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/earth-movement/>Earth Movement/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-209>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/earthquake/>Earthquake/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-52>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/explosion/>Explosion/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-202>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/faulty-workmanship-or-design/>Faulty Workmanship or Design/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-9>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/fire/>Fire/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-54>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/flood/>Flood/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-42>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/freezing-causes-of-loss/>Freezing/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-128>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/hailstorm/>Hailstorm/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-239>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/hidden-decay/>Hidden Decay/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-40>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/hurricane-causes-of-loss/>Hurricane/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-269>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/inherent-vice-and-latent-defect/>Inherent Vice and Latent Defect/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-177>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/mechanical-breakdown/>Mechanical Breakdown/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-110>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/microorganisma/>Microorganisma/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-111>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/microorganisms/>Microorganisms/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-119>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/mold/>Mold/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-235>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/mudslide-causes-of-loss/>Mudslide/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-220>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/odors/>Odors/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-207>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/order-of-civil-authority/>Order of Civil Authority/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-117>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/ordinance-or-law/>Ordinance or Law/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-203>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/particulates/>Particulates/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-41>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/pollution-causes-of-loss/>Pollution/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-273>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/product-recall/>Product Recall/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-89>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/seepage-or-leakage/>Seepage or Leakage/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-251>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/settling-or-cracking/>Settling or Cracking/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-147>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/sewer-backup/>Sewer Backup/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-44>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/sinkhole-causes-of-loss/>Sinkhole/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-224>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/smoke-and-soot/>Smoke and Soot/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-262>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/subsidence/>Subsidence/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-83>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/terrorism/>Terrorism/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-187>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/theft-or-dishonesty-causes-of-loss/>Theft or Dishonesty/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-45>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/tornado/>Tornado/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-194>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/vacancy-and-unoccupancy/>Vacancy and Unoccupancy/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-6>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/vandalism/>Vandalism/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-43>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/water-causes-of-loss/>Water/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-67>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/wear-and-tear/>Wear and Tear/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-223>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/wildfire/>Wildfire/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-205>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/causes-of-loss/winstorm/>Windstorm/a>/li>/ul>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-962>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/claim-investigation/>Claim Investigation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-196>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/co-insureds/>Co-Insureds/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-174>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/conditions/>Conditions/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-189>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/contamination-and-product-recall/>Contamination and Product Recall/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-231>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/cooperation/>Cooperation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-5>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/coverage/>Coverage/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-290>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/cyber-insurance/>Cyber Insurance/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-153>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/deductible/>Deductible/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-17>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/depreciation/>Depreciation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-58>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/direct-physical-loss-or-damage/>Direct Physical Loss or Damage/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-86>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/discovery/>Discovery/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-293>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/duty/>Duty/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-210>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/earthquake-insurance/>Earthquake Insurance/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-29>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/efficient-proximate-cause/>Efficient Proximate Cause/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-200>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/ensuing-loss/>Ensuing Loss/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-232>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/examinations-under-oath/>Examinations Under Oath/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-30>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/exclusions/>Exclusions/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-123>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/experts/>Experts/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-96>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/extra-expense/>Extra Expense/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-977>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/federal-appeals/>Federal Appeals/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-55>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/flood-insurance/>Flood Insurance/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-145>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/fortuity/>Fortuity/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-306>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/fraud/>Fraud/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-253>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/fraud-and-false-swearing/>Fraud and False Swearing/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-33>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/green-insurance/>Green Insurance/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-120>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/homeowners-coverage/>Homeowners Coverage/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-197>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/increase-in-hazard/>Increase in Hazard/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-135>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/inspection/>Inspection/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-20>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/insurable-interest/>Insurable Interest/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-149>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/insured-premises/>Insured Premises/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-60>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/investigation/>Investigation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-70>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/loss-adjustment/>Loss Adjustment/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-226>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/loss-payees/>Loss Payees/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-309>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/marine/>Marine/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-270>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/moral-hazard/>Moral Hazard/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-23>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/mortgagees/>Mortgagees/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-243>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/newly-acquired-property/>Newly-Acquired Property/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-62>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/notice/>Notice/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-241>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/occurrence/>Occurrence/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-127>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/prejudice/>Prejudice/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-95>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/premium/>Premiums/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-66>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/preservatioin-and-protection-of-property/>Preservation and Protection/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-98>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/privilege/>Privilege/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-90>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/proof-of-loss/>Proof of Loss/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-903>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/property-insurance-reform/>Property Insurance Reform/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-134>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/protective-safeguards/>Protective Safeguards/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-281>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/public-adjusters/>Public Adjusters/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-28>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/reasonable-expectations/>Reasonable Expectations/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-240>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/regulation/>Regulation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-94>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/reinstatement/>Reinstatement/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-84>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/reinsurance/>Reinsurance/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-35>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/replacement-cost/>Replacement Cost/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-133>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/rescission/>Rescission/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-85>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/reserves/>Reserves/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-291>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/spoliation/>Spoliation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-276>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/sue-and-labor/>Sue and Labor/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-46>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/suit-limitation/>Suit Limitation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-81>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/terrorism-insurance/>Terrorism Insurance/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-156>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/trigger/>Trigger/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-49>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/u-s-legal-system/>U.S. Legal System/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-1>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/uncategorized/>Uncategorized/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-215>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/unfair-insurance-practices/>Unfair Insurance Practices/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-130>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/vacant-or-unoccupied/>Vacant or Unoccupied/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-165>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/valuation/>Valuation/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-100>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/waiver/>Waiver/a>/li> li classcat-item cat-item-21>a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/category/water/>Water/a>/li> /ul> /div>div idtext-3 classwidget-wrapper widget_text>div classwidget-title>Cozen O’Connor Blogs/div> div classtextwidget>script srchttps://www.cozen.com/data/blogs.js>/script>/div> /div> /div>!-- end of #widgets --> /div>!-- end of #wrapper --> /div>!-- end of #container -->div idfooter classclearfix> div idfooter-wrapper> div classgrid col-940> div classgrid col-540> /div>!-- end of col-540 --> div classgrid col-380 fit> ul classsocial-icons>/ul>!-- end of .social-icons --> /div>!-- end of col-380 fit --> /div>!-- end of col-940 --> div classgrid col-300 copyright> © 2026a hrefhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/ titleCozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer> Cozen O'Connor's Property Insurance Law Observer /a> /div>!-- end of .copyright --> div classgrid col-300 scroll-top>a href#scroll-top titlescroll to top>↑/a>/div> div classgrid col-300 fit powered> a hrefhttp://www.cozen.com>img srchttp://www.nobadfaith.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/03/cozen-oconnor_logo.png/>/a> /div>!-- end .powered --> div> strong>a href/privacy-policy/>Privacy Policy/a>/strong>br>br> strong>Disclaimer/strong>br>This Blog/Website is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog/Website publisher. The Blog/Website should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.br>br>br>br> /div> /div>!-- end #footer-wrapper --> /div>!-- end #footer -->script typespeculationrules>{prefetch:{source:document,where:{and:{href_matches:/*},{not:{href_matches:/wp-*.php,/wp-admin/*,/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/*,/wp-content/*,/wp-content/plugins/*,/wp-content/themes/propertyinsurancelawobserver/*,/*\\?(.+)}},{not:{selector_matches:arel~\nofollow\}},{not:{selector_matches:.no-prefetch, .no-prefetch a}}},eagerness:conservative}}/script>script typetext/javascript srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/plugins/simple-share-buttons-adder/js/ssba.js?ver1761659236 idsimple-share-buttons-adder-ssba-js>/script>script typetext/javascript idsimple-share-buttons-adder-ssba-js-after>/* !CDATA */Main.boot( );//# sourceURLsimple-share-buttons-adder-ssba-js-after/* > *//script>script typetext/javascript srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/themes/propertyinsurancelawobserver/js/responsive-scripts.js?ver1.2.2 idresponsive-scripts-js>/script>script typetext/javascript srchttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-content/themes/propertyinsurancelawobserver/js/responsive-plugins.js?ver1.2.2 idresponsive-plugins-js>/script>script idwp-emoji-settings typeapplication/json>{baseUrl:https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/,ext:.png,svgUrl:https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/svg/,svgExt:.svg,source:{concatemoji:https://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-release.min.js?ver6.9.1}}/script>script typemodule>/* !CDATA *//*! This file is auto-generated */const aJSON.parse(document.getElementById(wp-emoji-settings).textContent),o(window._wpemojiSettingsa,wpEmojiSettingsSupports),sflag,emoji;function i(e){try{var t{supportTests:e,timestamp:(new Date).valueOf()};sessionStorage.setItem(o,JSON.stringify(t))}catch(e){}}function c(e,t,n){e.clearRect(0,0,e.canvas.width,e.canvas.height),e.fillText(t,0,0);tnew Uint32Array(e.getImageData(0,0,e.canvas.width,e.canvas.height).data);e.clearRect(0,0,e.canvas.width,e.canvas.height),e.fillText(n,0,0);const anew Uint32Array(e.getImageData(0,0,e.canvas.width,e.canvas.height).data);return t.every((e,t)>eat)}function p(e,t){e.clearRect(0,0,e.canvas.width,e.canvas.height),e.fillText(t,0,0);var ne.getImageData(16,16,1,1);for(let e0;en.data.length;e++)if(0!n.datae)return!1;return!0}function u(e,t,n,a){switch(t){caseflag:return n(e,\ud83c\udff3\ufe0f\u200d\u26a7\ufe0f,\ud83c\udff3\ufe0f\u200b\u26a7\ufe0f)?!1:!n(e,\ud83c\udde8\ud83c\uddf6,\ud83c\udde8\u200b\ud83c\uddf6)&&!n(e,\ud83c\udff4\udb40\udc67\udb40\udc62\udb40\udc65\udb40\udc6e\udb40\udc67\udb40\udc7f,\ud83c\udff4\u200b\udb40\udc67\u200b\udb40\udc62\u200b\udb40\udc65\u200b\udb40\udc6e\u200b\udb40\udc67\u200b\udb40\udc7f);caseemoji:return!a(e,\ud83e\u1fac8)}return!1}function f(e,t,n,a){let r;const o(rundefined!typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope?new OffscreenCanvas(300,150):document.createElement(canvas)).getContext(2d,{willReadFrequently:!0}),s(o.textBaselinetop,o.font600 32px Arial,{});return e.forEach(e>{set(o,e,n,a)}),s}function r(e){var tdocument.createElement(script);t.srce,t.defer!0,document.head.appendChild(t)}a.supports{everything:!0,everythingExceptFlag:!0},new Promise(t>{let nfunction(){try{var eJSON.parse(sessionStorage.getItem(o));if(objecttypeof e&&numbertypeof e.timestamp&&(new Date).valueOf()e.timestamp+604800&&objecttypeof e.supportTests)return e.supportTests}catch(e){}return null}();if(!n){if(undefined!typeof Worker&&undefined!typeof OffscreenCanvas&&undefined!typeof URL&&URL.createObjectURL&&undefined!typeof Blob)try{var epostMessage(+f.toString()+(+JSON.stringify(s),u.toString(),c.toString(),p.toString().join(,)+));,anew Blob(e,{type:text/javascript});const rnew Worker(URL.createObjectURL(a),{name:wpTestEmojiSupports});return void(r.onmessagee>{i(ne.data),r.terminate(),t(n)})}catch(e){}i(nf(s,u,c,p))}t(n)}).then(e>{for(const n in e)a.supportsnen,a.supports.everythinga.supports.everything&&a.supportsn,flag!n&&(a.supports.everythingExceptFlaga.supports.everythingExceptFlag&&a.supportsn);var t;a.supports.everythingExceptFlaga.supports.everythingExceptFlag&&!a.supports.flag,a.supports.everything||((ta.source||{}).concatemoji?r(t.concatemoji):t.wpemoji&&t.twemoji&&(r(t.twemoji),r(t.wpemoji)))});//# sourceURLhttps://www.propertyinsurancelawobserver.com/wp-includes/js/wp-emoji-loader.min.js/* > *//script>/body>/html>
View on OTX
|
View on ThreatMiner
Please enable JavaScript to view the
comments powered by Disqus.
Data with thanks to
AlienVault OTX
,
VirusTotal
,
Malwr
and
others
. [
Sitemap
]